欢迎访问 武汉桑拿导航网!

The old news has been used as a case of news hype

作者:admin日期:

分类:123/都市资讯/

vCCTV News: Not only is 5G, China's development in other areas has also received attention. The Australian think tank Loy Institute recently announced that the new version of the "Asian Strength Index" report shows that in terms of comprehensive strength, China is rapidly narrowing the gap with the United States. The 2019 "Asian Strength Index" released by the Loy Institute on May 8th scored a total of 100 points in 25 countries and regions in the Asia-Pacific region such as Japan, the United States, China and Russia. The United States scored 84.5 points on the overall strength, ranking first, "maintaining superior strength." China ranked second with 75.9 points, and Kyodo News commented that China is "a rapidly rising superpower approaching the United States." Japan, India and Russia are ranked third, fourth and fifth.

In addition, the United States ranked first in four areas including “military strength” (86 points), “resilience” (85.3), and “cultural influence” (86.7 points). China ranks first in four areas: “economic strength” (100 points), “future prospects” (85.6 points), and “diplomatic influence” (96.2 points). The report said that the United States "maintained superior strength," but also said that "it is facing a relative recession." The report pointed out that in order to continue to maintain the top position, "the United States needs to actively maintain an environment that supports the rule-based trading system and maximize the overall strength and benefits of partners and allies", urging the United States to change from a protectionist policy.

Where does the driving force of China's economy come from? Innovation ability is one of the most concerned areas for foreign media. According to a report by the BBC on May 27, some of the scientific and technological news announced by China in recent years have sensationalized the world, which has already demonstrated China's momentum of competing with the West in the field of science and technology. The report quoted the National Science Foundation's latest annual report saying that although the United States still has absolute advantages in many high-tech fields, such as chips, computer software, etc., China's total investment in high-tech fields is limited to the end of 2018. It has been less than $6 billion (about 41.4 billion yuan) from Silicon Valley. Xinhua News Agency, Chengdu, June 2 (Reporter Jiang Lin) On the 2nd, along with the roaring sound of the knife-cutter, the No. 4 "Big Mac" shield machine was at No. 1 Well of Chengdu Century City Station - Haichang Road Station. The receiving end broke ground. This marks that all the tunnels of Chengdu Rail Transit Line 18 will be opened, and the whole line will be “hole-through”.

This 66.71-kilometer Chengdu Rail Transit Line 18 is a composite function line connecting Chengdu's main urban area with Chengdu Tianfu International Airport, the market express line and the airport express line. It is not only the first rail transit line with a design speed of 140 kilometers per hour in China, but also the longest urban rail transit line in China. There are 13 stations in total. According to Wang Guoyi, deputy chief engineer of China Construction and Construction Investment Co., Ltd., the project was jointly invested by China Electric Power Construction Co., Ltd. and Chengdu Rail Transit Group. It is the largest PPP project for domestic rail transit investment. Since the first shield machine began work, the construction personnel have been working on this line for more than 800 days and nights. After the realization of the whole line of “dongtong”, the Chengdu Rail Transit Line 18 project will be fully transferred to the track laying, decoration and electromechanical equipment installation stage.

Wang Guoyi said that up to now, 14 track-laying bases of the 18th line have been officially opened 11 times, with a design track of 168.867 kilometers and an completion rate of 84.845 kilometers. The completion rate is over half; comprehensive monitoring and gas fire extinguishing respectively complete 20% of the total work, 40 %; communication engineering completed 18%, and professional construction after various stations is accelerating. The Ministry of Education is unlikely to announce the termination of cooperation with universities in the United States, the United States, Australia and Canada. This news is a rumor. Because the pace of China's opening up to the outside world is unstoppable, the Ministry of Education is unlikely to reverse the practice and announce the termination of cooperation with universities in the United States, the United States, Australia and Canada. If this happens, it is a closed-door country ---- the country must have a big deal.

However, there is no wind and no waves. It turned out that on March 27th, an online article entitled "Department of Education Announced: Termination of Cooperation with Universities in the United States, America, Australia and Canada (with a detailed list)" was disseminated and quickly reprinted. The article said that the Ministry of Education recently issued a statement, terminated 234 undergraduate and above Chinese-foreign cooperative education institutions and projects, and listed a detailed list. The most deceptive thing is that this title party rumor article is also accompanied by a screenshot of the official website of the Ministry of Education. In the Internet age, many people read articles only to read the title, not to read the content. This also inevitably contributed to the spread of some rumors. But this rumor has caused misunderstandings and panic among some parents, thinking that they can't study abroad in the future?

In fact, there are two issues that need clarification here. The first is the date from the release of the Ministry of Education document on the screenshot, which was issued by the Ministry of Education on June 21, 2018. This is not news, but obviously an old news. Second, from the contents of the documents of the Ministry of Education, this is not to terminate cooperation with universities in the United States, the United States, Australia and Canada, but to terminate 234 undergraduate and above-mentioned Chinese-foreign cooperative education institutions and projects with some national universities. The specific project content was published on the Education Foreign-related Supervision Information Network under the Ministry of Education on July 4, 2018. (The title of the document "Ministry of Education approves the termination of 234 undergraduate and above-mentioned Chinese-foreign cooperative education institutions and projects"

According to the document, as of June 2018, there were 2,342 Chinese-foreign cooperative education institutions and projects, including 1,090 undergraduate institutions and projects. The institutions and projects that were terminated this time accounted for less than 10% of the total. The Ministry of Education also explained the reason for the termination: "At the same time of accelerating development, some institutions and projects have insufficient introduction of quality education resources, the quality of teaching is not high, the professional competence of disciplines is not strong, and the lack of connotative development mechanism leads to low student satisfaction. The attraction is weak and school activities are difficult to sustain."

It can be seen that this matter is not directly related to the Chinese students studying abroad, and has nothing to do with the normal inter-school cooperation between Chinese universities and foreign universities. The move is that the Ministry of Education regularly reviews and cleans up the institutions and projects of Chinese-foreign cooperation in running schools in China. Do not over-interpret. As this incident has a great impact, I noticed that on March 28th, the “Study Supervisory Network” that issued the above-mentioned “rumors” issued a statement: Recently, the Supervisory Network of the Study Abroad has released the “Ministry of Education announced: Termination An article with the cooperation of universities in the United States, the United States, Australia and Canada (with a detailed list). This article misuses the news content of last year and misread the national foreign policy on major education. It is now solemnly stated that it is corrected.

So what is the so-called "study supervision network" that is such a misleading error message? From the "Introduction to the Supervisory Network" on the website, we can see that it introduces itself: the Supervising Supervisory Network, the Overseas Student Supervising Service Network, affiliated to Beijing Zhongjiao Anxue Education Technology Co., Ltd., which was founded in 2009. The Internet information service provider filed by the relevant state departments is the only third-party independent platform engaged in the supervision of the study intermediary service in China.

It can be seen that the name "study supervision network" which is a bit of an official color is an educational institution. I don't know where it can be seen that it is "the only third-party independent platform that is engaged in the supervision of study intermediary services". Don't compare it with the “Educational Foreign Affairs Regulatory Information Network” under the Ministry of Education. This title is a bit sensational. At first glance, it is considered a serious matter, but it is not. The Ministry of Education has terminated cooperation with universities in the United States, the United States, Australia and Canada, but it does not mean that we cannot study in these countries. If this is the case, what is the difference between a closed country and a closed country a hundred years ago?

The university that terminated the cooperation announced by the Ministry of Education is only a part of it, and the object of termination of cooperation is Sino-foreign joint venture. Sino-foreign joint ventures have developed rapidly over the past decade. Many universities in China have Sino-foreign joint ventures, ranging from one to two colleges. For example, Peking University and La Trobe University in Australia have jointly organized a master's degree program in health management, Zhengzhou University Shengda Economic and Trade Management College, Hebei Science and Technology Teachers College, and so on. There are 234 schools involved.

Universities such as Sino-foreign joint ventures are generally affiliated or independent in domestic universities, trained by domestic universities, and cultivated by foreign schools. It adopts the mode of 2+2, 3+1, 4+0. In the past few years, it went to school in China and went abroad to study in the next few years. When you graduate, you have two degree certificates, one is domestic and the other is foreign.

Compared with domestic universities, the most obvious difference between Chinese and foreign joint ventures is that the fees are high and the admission scores are low. Some schools enroll students and do not only look at the college entrance examination scores, but also value the comprehensive quality scores of the students. The college entrance examination scores only account for 40% or 60% of the score. Shanghai Xingwei College, which has a high charge before, has a cost of 150,000 a year, and Shanghai New York University has a cost of 100,000 a year. These are all Sino-foreign joint ventures.

A few days ago, the Ministry of Education announced that it would terminate cooperation with overseas universities such as the United Kingdom, the United States, Australia and Canada. The reason is because there are too many cooperative institutions and there is a tendency to spread. It has been reported that there are currently 2,342 Chinese-foreign cooperative education institutions and projects, which is so large that there are problems in management, the level of running schools is not high, and the qualifications for foreign qualifications are not strict. Cooperation in running schools has certain blindness. For these reasons, To solve these problems well, I had to choose to terminate. In this regard, Xiao Bian believes that the access system should be strengthened and the qualification review should be strengthened; regular assessments should be carried out, and those who are not of high quality and poorly managed should be banned in time.

With the increase in domestic and foreign schools, the problems are gradually emerging. Mainly in the blind cooperation in running schools, their own management capabilities are limited, the level of running schools is not high, neglecting foreign qualifications, and the scale-based growth model encounters bottlenecks. The emergence of these problems has made the level of Sino-foreign joint ventures uneven, and the entire industry is mixed, so the Ministry of Education will announce the termination. There were only 234 colleges and universities that were terminated, but the fact is that there are 2,342 Chinese-foreign joint venture institutions and projects, and there are 1,090 undergraduate institutions. 234 have been terminated, and there are more than 700.
(List of Chinese-foreign joint ventures that have been terminated)

If there is no way to guarantee the quality of teaching, the implementation of the exit mechanism is the greatest responsibility to students and parents. For those Sino-foreign joint ventures that do not meet the school regulations, the termination of cooperation can guarantee the interests of the entire domestic student. It is not possible to make those schools with low levels of education, and schools without qualifications continue to be deceived in the country, deceiving candidates and parents.

Some Chinese-foreign joint ventures run schools that sound very high and are very tempting, but candidates must keep their eyes open when they choose a school. In particular, candidates with lower scores cannot be deceived because of a paper diploma. Skills are learned, and they are doing their own work. The market-oriented products such as home appliances and automobiles are first Sino-foreign joint ventures, and they can be sole proprietorship. The same is true of the spiritual level. The related cooperation has ended, meaning that they are all free and more free.

At first glance, it seems to be a very regrettable thing. If you want to participate in the Anglo-Australian-Australian-Australian education project, you can't do it, even reminiscent of such contradictions as the West. With a little more thought, we can understand: On the one hand, we have terminated this kind of grafting cooperation in domestic universities, on the other hand, we will certainly open the door and welcome the gradual entry of foreign capital. Our country will grow bigger and bigger, and we will become more confident.

On the one hand, we cultivate our own systems, and things with Chinese culture will be strengthened; on the other hand, whether it is Japanese, Western, or Latin American, there is a need for subdivision, and it is satisfied with a subdivided education system. The opportunistic way, of course, the less. The way of the previous transition will naturally fade. If we do not cooperate with domestic institutions, the education system of the United States, the United States and Canada will be more difficult to penetrate. On the other hand, we can continue to play various aspects of the game in the form of market-changing technology.

In my understanding, we are very eager to learn, and the global education system and methods have been tried. This is how we build more cultural self-confidence. Many Chinese-foreign joint schools are liar schools. They have fooled many Chinese parents, deceived many students, defrauded a lot of money, and then students did not learn anything. This kind of Sino-foreign cooperation in running schools is more of a gimmick. The Ministry of Education has only terminated a part of the cooperative education, and some of the more excellent ones continue to be opened. We also have better Sino-foreign cooperation in running schools. I will simply say three.

China actually has a real Sino-foreign cooperation in running schools, and it is a school level rather than an internal one. There are three, they are an enrollment, and as far as the current development trend is concerned, they are increasingly optimistic, and the admission scores are getting higher and higher. The tuition fees are getting higher and higher, the employment situation of graduates is getting better and better, and the admission of prestigious universities is increasing.

The three schools are Sino-US cooperation, Shanghai New York University, Sino-British Joint Office, Xipu University, and Ningnuo University. These schools are not 985 or 211, but they are now in the forefront of teaching evaluation. In some disciplines, some of their disciplines are already in the top. Although it is more than half a year ago, the old news (non-fake news), but this time it can be turned out to cause a lot of attention. This phenomenon shows that in the eyes of parents, there are multiple weights that allow children to receive a part of Western education. This is also the desire of many students. Needless to say, slamming is a very prominent feature when we do a lot of things, and Sino-foreign cooperative education is no exception. Today, after 20 years of Sino-foreign cooperation in running schools, it is inevitable that fish and dragons will be mixed. Therefore, it is normal to stay and stay. The education department is responsible for the inaction and dereliction of duty.

One of the most famous overseas universities in the list of universities that have been terminated is probably New York University. In addition, in Pudong, Shanghai New York University, which was founded in 2012 by East China Normal University and New York University, has become famous. Many people think that Shanghai New York University has been closed. But the fact is that four projects, such as the "Engineering (Interactive Creative) Master's Degree Education", were terminated, and not the institution of New York University in Shanghai was suspended. A total of 234 Dongdongli, which was terminated this time, the vast majority (230) are Chinese and foreign cooperation projects in various universities. And those who are bigger than the project, majors and projects, the Chinese and foreign sides have already established colleges in China's colleges and universities, and only four have been terminated this time.

The old news has been used as a case of news hype, and will appear again in the future. Everyone needs to improve their ability to distinguish. In addition to the news source, the simple method is to look at the reports of different media, and then draw conclusions after comparison. However, the author also believes that in view of the ranking of colleges and universities around the world today, only two of China can enter the top 50, and the top 20 are mainly American universities, even the top ten, it is not at all Things will change in the short term. Therefore, the trend of a considerable part of Chinese students going abroad will not change for the foreseeable future.
本文标签:

相关阅读

  • 华尔街没有夜生活(布斯游记)

  • admin年轻一族
  • After the founding of New China, many unconventional practices were adopted in order to quickly open up diplomatic work. One example is the high-profile and high courtesy to welcome the guests. In the 1970s, China gradually canceled the wel
  • We learned the story of kitten fishing very early

  • admin年轻一族
  • Many people have heard this story more or less, saying that the eagles life span can reach 70 years, but at the age of 40 it has to go through a very painful process. Only when it passes, can it be reborn, otherwise it is only waiting. death
  • 吉吉PK被打到玉龙雪山吃西瓜了

  • admin旅游在线
  • The reporter noted that Zhang Caiying has served in the Agricultural Eighth Division for a long time. Prior to this, many people in the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps had been investigated. Zhang Caiying is a famous female cadre.
关键词不能为空
极力推荐

聚合标签

关于我们 联系我们