欢迎访问 武汉桑拿导航网!

The UFO phenomenon observed in many places in China in the e



The UFO phenomenon observed in many places in China in the early morning of June 2 (above) seems to have reached a conclusion. The "UFO Sky" of the suspected missile test was simultaneously ridiculed by the Rockets and the Chinese Navy's official account on the night of the 3rd. On the 4th, the overseas media simply decided: "This is the latest successful launch of China's 'Julang-3' submarine-launched intercontinental missile."

Earlier, it was reported that in the early morning of June 2, Shandong, Shanxi, Henan, Hebei and other places found "light-emitting UFOs" in the sky, "a bright object like a comet, dragging a long tail in the air. Flying through." Just when the outside world speculated on this mysterious sky, the official account of the Rockets Army @东风快递 released a photo of the "Dongfeng-21" ballistic missile at night on the night of the 3rd with a copy of the text "Do you believe that there is UFO in this world?" Good night, small 'fire' with ~". Then the official account of the Chinese Navy @民海军 also released a picture of the missile launched from the sea, and @东风快递 said, "#海语海言# Do you also believe in UFO? @东风快递 Good night, small sea powder."

The magical "UFO Sky" and the PLA's two major military speculations have quickly attracted the attention of foreign media. The US United Press said: "The mysterious light in the night sky may come from China's latest missile test. The missile was launched from the Bohai Sea near Shandong, belonging to China's third-generation solid-fuel submarine-launched ballistic missile." Reuters on the 4th described the interaction between the Rockets and the official account of the Chinese Navy. Although the "People's Liberation Army usually does not announce a new missile test," the British Jane's Defense website believes that the so-called "UFO" in China is actually The PLA’s new generation of submarine-launched ballistic missiles, “Julang-3”, passed through the sky. The Pentagon announced in the latest edition of the "China Military Report" that the new missile may be installed on China's next-generation strategic nuclear submarine, which will serve in the early 1920s. "The United States is closely watching the development of ‘Julang-3’ because it has a longer range than the PLA’s active model and will significantly enhance China’s nuclear deterrence.”

Singapore’s "Lianhe Zaobao" said on the 4th that in conjunction with the "Liao Air Traffic Police 0096" navigation warning issued by the Liaoning Maritime Safety Administration website on June 2, "the relevant experts judged that this should be China’s retesting the submarine shooting 'Julang-3' missile. The test missile flies from east to west and falls to a certain range in northwestern China. "This is the second time that China has tested the 'Julang-3' missile since the end of November last year." The report claimed that the "Julang" series of submarine-launched ballistic missiles are sea-based nuclear strike weapons developed by China itself, mainly equipped with strategic nuclear submarines of Types 092 and 094. At present, the main type of the "Julang" series is "Julang-2" with a range of about 8,000 kilometers. According to the report, the "Julang-3" has a range of more than 12,000 kilometers and can carry up to 10 sub-guided nuclear warheads with better penetration and hit accuracy.

However, the Lianhe Zaobao also mentioned that compared with the sea-based nuclear strike capability of the United States and Russia, there is still a big gap between the launching platforms and missiles of China’s sea-based nuclear forces. In addition to the "Julang" series of missiles, "China is also stepping up the development of the 096 new generation of strategic nuclear submarines. Once the 'Julang-3' missile is combined with the 096 nuclear submarine, China's sea-based nuclear strike capability will truly take a big step." . The US "San Francisco Chronicle" article on the 3rd, the original question: the early warning of studying abroad makes American colleges and universities worried that Chinese students may reduce the risk of China's education abroad in the United States, which may pose a serious challenge to American higher education, because China is the largest university in the United States. The international student source country. US institutions are benefiting from the tuition fees paid by Chinese students and their global perspective for campuses. The US High Correction has tried to understand how US-China friction will affect enrollment.

George Washington University currently has about a hundred Chinese undergraduates, accounting for about half of the university's international students. “Their contribution is not only (increasing school income),” said Soromau, the school’s admissions officer. “Our Chinese students are performing well.” As of Monday, 10 Chinese students who have been accepted and delivered deposits have decided No longer attending the school. Soromau said that this phenomenon is more than ever, and he heard that other American colleges and universities have similar situations. "We are all uneasy about this." Emerson University Admissions Officer John Latin said: "Excellent Chinese students The arrival has enhanced our ability to provide the best educational environment."

Restricting the enrollment of Chinese students may have many implications. The top universities in the United States will lament the loss of outstanding talent from China, while other American universities worry about the stability of a key source of income. Abney, assistant director of the admissions office at Colgate University, said that about one-third of the school’s more than 70 international students are from China. The decline in Chinese students will lead to the financial losses of some American colleges and universities, and will also expose the campus culture to potential losses. There are many Chinese students at Pomona College. “If we claim to have the best education system in the world, we must be globally competitive,” said Garibel Starr, dean of the college, “not just to attract students from our backyard or homeland.” She said Chinese students make the campus more intellectual and culturally diverse.

At the University of California at Berkeley, international students from China are the largest international student group. A spokesperson for the school said: "We will continue to ensure that every student on this campus feels safe, respected and popular, no matter which country they come from." Mary Coleman, president of the American Association of Universities, said that the United States has long been recruited from around the world. The top students, the perception that the United States does not welcome (foreign students) will have a detrimental effect. So many international students from China, let them shun the United States, will cause serious impact on the Hong Kong Asia Times online 4th article, the original title: the trade war against China has become more and more stupid, the trade war has caused tens of billions of losses to the US economy . But it seems that it is not bad enough. Trump threatens to impose tariffs on more Chinese products if he does not get the agreement he wants. Trump may have to wait for a long time, because China is counter-attacking and vowed to take more countermeasures. As a result, the US economy will suffer more blows - far more than Bitramp is willing to admit.

A large part of the "imports" from China is made by US companies in China. If Trump imposes tariffs on all Chinese imports as threatened, the US economy will suffer much more. US GDP will be reduced by more than 1%, and more than 2 million jobs will be lost. The average annual household income may be reduced by more than 2,300 US dollars. The trade war not only harms the US-China economy, but also pulls other countries directly or indirectly connected to the global supply chain. A trade war that destroys the supply chain is like dumping money in the sewer. As a result, all economies involved in the supply chain will slow down.

The dumbest decision made by the Trump administration may be to ban Chinese-made telecommunications equipment from entering the US market and prevent US technology companies from supplying to Chinese companies such as Huawei, which will result in profits and market losses, destroying the global network ecosystem. . The biggest losers will be American technology companies, which are likely to lose the Chinese market. More importantly, the science and technology war will disrupt the global telecommunications supply chain. Many parts of Western smartphones and other telecommunications equipment are produced in China, and the US, Europe, Japan and South Korea companies will encounter operational difficulties at least in the short term. Of course, Chinese technology companies will also be hit in the short term. However, many analysts believe that Huawei may have sufficient capacity to become stronger in the medium and long term.

If China really violates WTO rules and “eats American lunches”, if Huawei does pose a security threat to the United States, then the United States has the right to protect itself. However, what Washington calls “unfair” trade, technology spies, etc., all such allegations are nothing more than alarmist speculations aimed at gaining domestic support and confronting China. In addition, even with the help of allies, if it is not to resort to a comprehensive economic or military war, it is too late for the United States to "let China yield." For economic or military wars, even the Chinese hawks may not dare to try. (Author Ken Mok)

Singapore Asian News Channel 4th article, original title: In this trade war, China is waiting for the timing Trump's tariff policy stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of the bilateral trade deficit. For a simple example, I went to a convenience store to buy snacks and coffee. This store didn't buy anything from me, which is equivalent to my trade deficit with the store. According to Trump's logic, I have to run back to the store to complain about this imbalance and insist that the store buy the equivalent from me. If every country acts according to this logic, we will soon return to the era of barter.

It is almost impossible to isolate China today. For example, the “One Belt, One Road” initiative launched by Beijing has participated in more than 100 countries and nearly 30 international organizations. At present, China is actually waiting for the opportunity to know that the United States is unlikely to insist on high tariffs for too long. If the United States insists on doing so, the end result will be to give room to China in the global economy. I am the name of a leaf, knowing that there is a fairy, I will answer this question. How to rank 31 vice-ministerial universities? What are the pros and cons of the administrative level for university construction? First, let's take a look at the administrative level of Chinese universities. The so-called deputy-level colleges refer to the level of principals and secretaries, and the deputy-level colleges refer to the list of cadre titles managed by the principals and clerk in the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.

First, 39 of the 985 universities in the deputy ministerial level are deputy ministerial level, and the National Defense Science and Technology University is the deputy military district level, which is equivalent to the deputy ministerial level. Therefore, there should be 32 deputy ministerial colleges and universities. In other words, there are seven 985 colleges and universities whose principals and secretaries are not deputy ministerial level but departmental level. They are the Central University for Nationalities, China Ocean University, East China Normal University, Northeastern University, Hunan University, University of Electronic Science and Technology, and South China. Polytechnic University.

Second, the bureau level removes all public undergraduates except 32 deputy and ministerial colleges, including seven 985s that are not deputy ministerial level, not 211 of 985. All ordinary undergraduate colleges and universities have the same level of principals. Bureau level. Some people may be confused. Some colleges and universities are managed by a certain province. They are directly managed by the Provincial Department of Education. The director of the Education Department is not at the same level as the headmaster of the university. Yes, one level, and they are all The organization department has accepted the fate. The so-called leadership is only that the Education Department has leadership over the business of the university rather than the superiority of the university leaders. Another point to note is that the first deputy secretary and the first vice president of the vice-ministerial college are also at the bureau level. Generally speaking, although the level of running a school is very different, all public undergraduate colleges and universities, except 32 vice-ministerial levels, have the same level of leadership and enjoy the same treatment.

Third, the deputy bureau level includes public colleges, public vocational and technical colleges. Generally speaking, colleges and universities in China are at the above three levels. Private colleges and universities are social schools and have no administrative level. 32 deputy ministerial colleges, the National Defense Science and Technology University is a military academy, and there are 31 colleges and universities. How do they rank? First, Tsinghua University and Peking University, they are the first file. This is not controversial. It is controversial that they are the bosses, and there is controversy that they have similar strength. Second, the five schools in East China are the re-investment of Zhejiang Keyan. The five schools have just established the Yangtze River Delta University Education Alliance, and are ready to unite more universities to enhance their school-running strength. The East China Five School has no objection in the second file. The controversial issue is also how the five schools rank internally. Of course, the NPC can also join the second file, and there are five people in Qingbeihua.

The third file, NPC, Hangkaiji, Zhongjian Nine School (Xijiao University, Harbin Institute of Technology, Wuda, Zhongshan, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Southeast University, Xiamen University, Tianda, Beili), Shanda, Sichuan University, Jida, Beijing Normal University, Central South the University. The fourth file, Xigong University, Chongqing University, Lanzhou University, Dalian University of Technology, Northwest Agriculture and Forestry, China Agricultural University. The figure below is the average of some of the 985 rankings in the international four major lists and domestic Wushulian and alumni associations, which can be used as a reference.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of the administrative level for the construction of colleges and universities? Because most of China's colleges and universities are public colleges and universities, especially the best batch of universities are all public colleges and universities, so there is the term of deputy ministerial level and departmental level. In fact, the administrative level of colleges and universities is different from the level of local administration. The administrative level of colleges and universities generally refers to the enjoyment of corresponding treatment. For example, the dean of the college is equivalent to the level of the college, enjoying the treatment at the level of the department, and the associate professor enjoys the deputy level. . However, if the administrative staff of a university or a person with the corresponding title has taken the path of official career, the administrative level will have a role. For example, some university presidents will be transferred to the director of the education department, and the dean of the colleges and universities may fall into the party and government organs. At the department level, this transfer is generally based on the position. Therefore, although the administrative duties of colleges and universities are different from those of civil servants, they do have an important role.

One problem brought about by the administrative level of colleges and universities is the gbwh of administrative staff. The administrative staff should serve the teachers, so that the teachers can work more peacefully than the high ones. The reason is that the administrative staff regards themselves as management personnel rather than service personnel. Colleges and universities should realize the rule of professors, professors should have a greater say, executives should do a good job, and provide ordinary teachers with a better research and teaching environment.


  • 华尔街没有夜生活(布斯游记)

  • admin年轻一族
  • After the founding of New China, many unconventional practices were adopted in order to quickly open up diplomatic work. One example is the high-profile and high courtesy to welcome the guests. In the 1970s, China gradually canceled the wel
  • We learned the story of kitten fishing very early

  • admin年轻一族
  • Many people have heard this story more or less, saying that the eagles life span can reach 70 years, but at the age of 40 it has to go through a very painful process. Only when it passes, can it be reborn, otherwise it is only waiting. death
  • 吉吉PK被打到玉龙雪山吃西瓜了

  • admin旅游在线
  • The reporter noted that Zhang Caiying has served in the Agricultural Eighth Division for a long time. Prior to this, many people in the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps had been investigated. Zhang Caiying is a famous female cadre.


关于我们 联系我们